[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:20:33 -0500 |
Hi all,
I've been lurking a bit on this thread, but felt I should comment.
I personally think we need a more general structure than \repeat will ever be
able to reasonably offer. Essentially, we need to be able to say that a single
movement/piece [of Lilypond code] consists of one or more \section blocks,
where a \section would have at least the following independent options:
1. indent value[s] and/or line lengths;
2. section title (e.g. "Trio").
Then, each section can or cannot include standard Lilypond \repeat structures,
as necessary.
BTW: I'm *not* saying that Lilypond's \repeat structure shouldn't be improved
-- I'm just suggesting that we might be looking at two different problems here.
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, David Pounder, 2010/02/15
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, David Pounder, 2010/02/15
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, David Pounder, 2010/02/16
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, David Pounder, 2010/02/16
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, David Kastrup, 2010/02/16
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, Ian Hulin, 2010/02/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, Ian Hulin, 2010/02/17
- Re: [frogs] Da Capos, Codas and Segnos, Anthony W. Youngman, 2010/02/24