[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!]
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!] |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:23:35 -0700 |
On 12/10/10 5:21 PM, "Francisco Vila" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2010/12/11 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>
>>> Whatever it does to obtain a new set of manuals, any daily snapshot
>>> should do the same.
>>
>> No. The docs on kainhofer.com are not our official docs. It is a
>> private server which Reinhold graciously makes available.
>> Compiling the docs from scratch requires a fair amount of
>> resources, ranging from CPU power to disk life (by using
>> read/writes) to electricity.
>>
>> I agree that any official "daily snapshot" should build from
>> scratch. But I don't think it's worth the resources it would
>> take. A daily doc build was fantastic during GDP, but these days
>> the docs don't change all that rapidly, and all doc contributors
>> can build the docs themselves (mostly with lilybuntu).
>
> If it's for the planet, it is obvious that a single daily snapshot
> takes far less resources than many snapshots made by contributors.
> Granted, other would pay for it, so that it's free for me. But "the
> whole amount is what counts" :-)
Yes, but we contributors don't do daily builds. We do builds when we make
changes (and we *need* to do builds to verify they work before we submit
changes).
Thanks,
Carl
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!], Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/12/09
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!], Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/12/10
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!], Graham Percival, 2010/12/11
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!], John Mandereau, 2010/12/11
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!], Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/12/12
Re: LilyBuntu [don't read kainhofer.com!], Valentin Villenave, 2010/12/12