[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Texinfo help, please
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Texinfo help, please |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2012 14:49:21 +0100 |
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:29 PM
> I think that most of these bad presentations are due to the fact that
> proofreading is done with the HTML version. We should then advocate
> that the "final draft" before pushing a patch that touches any part of
> the documentation, should be checked with the PDF version of the
> concerned manual.
I would hope not, as that would preclude my doing any
more documentation work. I do not have an easy means of
creating a pdf version from a patch. Of course if someone
else could check the pdf version during the review that
would be fine.
Trevor
- Re: Texinfo help, please, (continued)
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/07/11
- Re: Texinfo help, please, David Kastrup, 2012/07/11
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Graham Percival, 2012/07/11
- Re: Texinfo help, please, David Kastrup, 2012/07/11
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Graham Percival, 2012/07/12
- Re: Texinfo help, please, David Kastrup, 2012/07/13
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Graham Percival, 2012/07/13
- Re: Texinfo help, please, David Kastrup, 2012/07/13
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Phil Holmes, 2012/07/13
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/07/14
- Re: Texinfo help, please,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Graham Percival, 2012/07/14
- Re: Texinfo help, please, Graham Percival, 2012/07/14