[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055) |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:45:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:24:06PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Again: I don't see that Texinfo behavior precludes us from writing
> consistent input. Mapping this input to current Texinfo behavior is a
> matter of redefining a macro then.
I don't see how this can be done with a macro, but I'm quite
willing to believe that I don't know enough texinfo. AFAIK
@cindex \foo
adds "\foo" to the index. Is there any way we could write
@cindex \foo foo
to mean "sort this in location 'foo', but print out '\foo'" ? or
even better, automatically redefine
@cindex \foo
to remove any backslash from the sort-order but still print the
backslash?
> Looking at the Texinfo source, it would appear that the main makeinfo
> engine uses the locale-aware system sorting routines, so it is
> conceivable that calling Texinfo with a suitable LC_COLLATE setting
> might do the trick on systems having locales supporting this kind of
> order.
... no clue what LC_COLLATE is.
Anyway, if you can produce a proof-of-concept demonstration of
\foo being sorted in any index without the backslash, then I'll
gladly organize a policy discussion on exactly how we want to
write the index entries, and exactly how we want the index(es) to
look.
- Graham
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), (continued)
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), ArnoldTheresius, 2012/07/18
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), David Kastrup, 2012/07/18
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Ian Hulin, 2012/07/18
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Phil Holmes, 2012/07/18
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Ian Hulin, 2012/07/18
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Phil Holmes, 2012/07/18
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Graham Percival, 2012/07/19
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Graham Percival, 2012/07/19
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055),
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), David Kastrup, 2012/07/19
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), Graham Percival, 2012/07/19
- Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), ArnoldTheresius, 2012/07/18
Re: Volta enhancements tranche 1 (issue 6398055), graham, 2012/07/19