Re: Lilypond benchmarking

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith OHara" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond benchmarking


> Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes:
>
> > Summary: 2.12 was very slow and unreliable on large scores.  2.14, 2.16 
> > and
> > 2.17.26 are similar: it look like current devel is slower where there's a
> > lot of interleaving of notes and dynamics to be done, which is probably 
> > to
> > be expected with the more sophisticated skylining code.  I'd conclude 
> > there
> > is no fundamental performance problem with our current build.
>
>
> I assume your tables show the numbers of minutes required to typeset
> the input ?


Seconds, not minutes :-)

FWIW, I find my build machine on Ubuntu is much faster.

--
Phil Holmes