[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond benchmarking
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond benchmarking |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 05:12:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Keith OHara" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:14:24 -0700, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> From: "Keith OHara" <address@hidden>
>>> Is it possible to minimize an example, so we see if the old behavior
>>> is something we want? (as opposed to something that did what you
>>> wanted but for mysterious reasons.)
>>
>> I can provide a non-minimised example (Mikado song number 5).
>
> If you post the source or maybe link to it in a comment on
> http://codereview.appspot.com/13768045
> then I'll try to figure out what made the difference, next time I am on Linux.
<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3281> also looks
iffy, but according to comment #2, it's been around for a long time.
It's just another indication that our page breaking code is far from
being bug-free.
--
David Kastrup
- Lilypond benchmarking, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, James, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, David Kastrup, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Keith OHara, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Keith OHara, 2013/09/21
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Keith OHara, 2013/09/23
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, David Kastrup, 2013/09/23
- Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Keith OHara, 2013/09/25
Re: Lilypond benchmarking, David Kastrup, 2013/09/21
Re: Lilypond benchmarking, Keith OHara, 2013/09/21