[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0?
|
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
|
Subject: |
Re: 3.0? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:03:33 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Urs Liska writes:
> Is there _any_ notion what a LilyPond 3.0 may be?
I could imagine that if LilyPond were made into an engraving library,
and/or heavy rewiring to make it deeply integrated with a gui, or accept
another native input language like the lilypond-driven fixed fresh
release of MusicXML 4.0; something like that would warrant 3.0.
> I mean 2.0 followed on 1.8, and now we're already towards .20
We had major language changes and a deep incorporation of Guile, those
made good excuses to move away from the 1.0 series.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
- 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Mike Solomon, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Graham Percival, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, David Kastrup, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, karl, 2014/01/09
- Re: 3.0?, Paul Morris, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, Carl Peterson, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, karl, 2014/01/10
- Re: 3.0?, Urs Liska, 2014/01/10