[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-relative relative mode?
From: |
Matthias Kilian |
Subject: |
Re: non-relative relative mode? |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:36:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:54:16PM +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> I can however imagine that some things can be simpler to typeset with
> absolute mode, e.g. if there is a lot of chords and not so much melodic
> lines. This can be the case in some piano music.
Well, I've indeed some problems using relative mode with my chaconne
experiment. But whenever it becomes too complicated, I break the music
into very short sequences (sometimes only one bar¹), so I can see where
one polyphonic voice ends (and wether to apply octave switches to the
start of the next polyphonic voice).
I guess I'd even less problems when using the part combining feature. But
that would require me to refactor the 602 lines of LilyPond code I've
done allready :-)²
Maybe I'll try that when I've finished the current challenge (that
cadenca problem I noted some days ago, which I've found a quick hack for).
Ciao,
Kili
¹) What's the correct word: bar or measure? The glossary mentions both.
²) Hey, any Eclipse/Java hackers around? What about a LilyPond plugin
for Eclipse, with refactoring support?
Re: non-relative relative mode?, Reuben Thomas, 2004/02/26
Re: non-relative relative mode?, donald_j_axel, 2004/02/26
Re: non-relative relative mode?, David Raleigh Arnold, 2004/02/26