Re: Need Help Posting to LSR

[Graham Percival]

Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
> There is one problem --- the explanatory note is extremely large, and
> dwarfs the picture of the snippet itself. There also seems to be a
> problem with the line wrapping.

I can't see any problem with wrapping... what do you see?

> However, it might be better to put the
> explanation in a comment in the lily code, and a note to that effect
> in the explanation. This way the explanation will stay with the
> snippet, and will be a little easier to read.

To clarify this, you're talking about the technical stuff later on, 
right?  The initial text about chants is beautiful and should definitely 
remain in the description.


I have some other issues with the "using the template" section:

1.  Don't stick stuff inside the LilyPond app.  You can use directories 
inside your \include, as in
\include "~/lilyincludes/my-init.ly"

2.  I'm not certain that the info about lilypond-book is appropriate 
here.  The anglican template is quite usable on its own, and your 
texinfo tweaks (headers) are quite usable on _their_ own.  Maybe the 
lilypond-book stuff (with the headers and footers) could go in a 
separate snippet?   (I'm not really certain about this; LSR is optimized 
for pure lilypond snippets, but it would be nice to have _somewhere_ to 
stick neat tricks like this)

3.  I think the shell script and directory listing are going a bit 
overboard.


The lilypond template itself looks awesome, though.  Thanks!

Cheers,
- Graham