[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Measure number collision
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Measure number collision |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:38:14 +0200 (CEST) |
> The solution for this is to use more accurate glyph outlines than
> bounding boxes. I hope to do this at some point, but it is
> non-trivial.
Making metafont emit improved data on glyph outlines is quite easy.
The very question is *what* shall it emit...
Can you elaborate on this?
Werner
- Re: Measure number collision, (continued)
- Re: Measure number collision, Graham Percival, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Zoltán Selyem, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Graham Percival, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Arvid Grøtting, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/04/24
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/25