[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
|
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2008 23:37:30 +0200 |
2008/5/14 Karl Hammar <address@hidden>:
> From version 2.8 (I think) and up, find the file:
>
> midi.scm
Is it not performance.cc?
(in this case it would require a recompilation)
We recently had the same question on the French mailing list.
Cheers,
Valentin
- *.mid vs *.midi, Don Whitener, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Michael David Crawford, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Graham Percival, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/16