[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
From: |
CDon |
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2008 14:57:49 -0700 (PDT) |
Karl Hammar wrote:
>
> change the .midi to .mid, and you should get what you want (though I
> have not tested it).
>
Thanks Karl, this looks promising but does not work. There is a TODO at the
top of the file stating:
";; this is broken: we should not ever export variables from Scheme."
It is not clear what this is referring to, but the implication is that the
whole file is broken. I then assume that setting the .midi extension must
be done some other place (?).
Don
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/*.mid-vs-*.midi-tp17235029p17241827.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- *.mid vs *.midi, Don Whitener, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
CDon <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Michael David Crawford, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Graham Percival, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/05/17