[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
|
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2008 14:28:19 +0200 |
2008/5/15 Karl Hammar <address@hidden>:
> Perhaps you have better luck if you change the "midi" to "mid"
> and recompile.
The question that was asked on the French list about also implied that
these files should be typed as .mid by default...
I tried to have a look at the MIDI 1.0 specs to see if there was any
"official" extension, but couldn't find one. Windows users seem to
believe that .mid is more legitimate than .midi, but non-MS users are
used to non-three-letters extensions.
Cheers,
Valentin
- *.mid vs *.midi, Don Whitener, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Michael David Crawford, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Graham Percival, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17