lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Transpose


From: Carl D. Sorensen
Subject: Re: Transpose
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:09:39 -0600



On 3/30/09 4:58 PM, "Ossie Wilson Snr" <address@hidden> wrote:

>  
> And yes, Win98 users are stuck at 2.8.
> I do have computers with much faster chips and later versions, but I am still
> waiting for a stable version to appear. I thought it would be 2.12 but now
> there is talk of 2.14 in the next couple of months so heres hoping that we
> will get a new command \nbd (no bloody doubles) included  in it.

If I were you, I'd upgrade to 2.12.  2.12 is a stable version.  There will
be a 2.14, but 2.12 is so much better than 2.8 that you ought to give it a
shot, in my opinion.

>  
> At least I didnĀ¹t draw fire from Graham Percival because I did at least read
> the appropriate section of his new documentation even though Carl says that
> snippet is broken (in docs for the latest OstableĀ¹ version).

I haven't checked the snippet in the docs; I was just referring to the
version in your file.  It's broken at least by missing a paragraph (or at
least is was when I copied it into my file; I think that may be why you got
the error you did.

But I think that it doesn't work right for large transpose values.

Thanks,

Carl





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]