lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Complex time signature


From: Arle Lommel
Subject: Re: Complex time signature
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:57:48 -0500

> Somebody in this list used the notation of writing just the number in the 
> staff, and the '+' decomposition above it and the staff within parenthesis in 
> smaller size. That seems me to be a good idea. The '+' is not needed if the 
> decomposition can be seen from the beaming.

Seems like a good way to approach it. I prefer the format I use in some work 
I've, but primarily because I was writing pieces with shifting polymetrics and 
preferred to make everything rather obvious. But the idea you mention does seem 
appropriate where the emphasis in the score is not on the rhythm and something 
more discreet is desired.

-Arle




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]