[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: horizontal beams
From: |
ljc |
Subject: |
Re: horizontal beams |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:45:26 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7) |
Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
#+inf.0 without any extra tweaks *should* work in all cases or not. If it
should then we have a bug and it should be reported as such.
yes, i think that the tweak definitely should work without further
tweaks. it looks more like a bug than anything else to me. but since
i'm not very knowledgeable about lilypond, i'm not confident to report
it as a bug.
So (and I apologise if you had already done this) can you provide the .ly
file you have where the \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 isn't enough?
by trial and error i found this as a minimal example. please note that
it's not consistent: in the first two measures all the beams are
horizontal, in the next two some are not.
\version "2.13.44"
\relative c'' {
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
f16 g a b a c d g, a b a c d e f g,
}
- horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/20
- RE: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/20
- RE: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/21
- RE: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/21
- RE: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams,
ljc <=
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/26