[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User comments on R shorthand
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: User comments on R shorthand |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 23:31:25 +0100 |
[snip long discussion]
hi people,
I'd love to be able to write R*4 to get 4 full measure rests without
having to think about time signature. This would be very convenient.
Therefore i'm sorry to hear that such a feature is likely impossible
to implement properly (if David says so, there's a good chance that
he's right).
David, if you discover something that would allow this (or similar)
feature to be implemented, let us know and we'll be grateful.
thanks and best wishes to everyone,
Janek
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Kieren MacMillan
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> If it is entered into the tracker, I strongly suggest adding a link to
>> my mail with the LilyPond example for a startling bar count. It might
>> keep people from wasting unnecessary time due to underestimating the
>> problem.
>
> +1
> That example certainly pointed out a significant hurdle to implementing this
> feature.
>
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, (continued)
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Raleigh Arnold, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Phil Holmes, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand,
Janek Warchoł <=
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Noeck, 2013/03/20
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Olivier Biot, 2013/03/23
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Wilbert Berendsen, 2013/03/24