Re: Discuss signature for new function \annotate (new version)

[Urs Liska]

Am 11.06.2013 12:46, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> 2013/6/10 Urs Liska <address@hidden>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > thanks to the feedback on this list I reviewed the interface to my \annotate
> > function and think it has become quite elegant now.
> > Please have a look at the attached file and at the updated description on
> > https://github.com/openlilylib/lilypond-doc/wiki/Documenting-musical-content
> > I'm interested in any caveats, enhancement suggestions, and/or further use
> > cases.
> One word: awesome!
>
> Janek :)
Well, that explicitely does _not_ answer my question. Thank you anyway :-)

BUT: so far we're still discussing the interface and nothing of the 
implementation yet.
And it will be hard as I'm still standing puzzled before each single 
Scheme snippet. By now I'm starting (slowly) to get into getting 
familiar with how this everything-is-an-expression-in-parens works. But 
I'm still feeling dumb when it comes to simple things like processing 
the elements of a list. Not to speak of all the interfaces between 
Scheme and LilyPond.

But I definitely _need_ this lilypond-doc, so I'll struggle to get my 
way through it.

Urs