Re: Discuss signature for new function \annotate (new version)

[Janek Warchoł]

2013/6/11 Urs Liska <address@hidden>:
> Am 11.06.2013 12:46, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> One word: awesome!
>>
>> Janek :)
>
> Well, that explicitely does _not_ answer my question. Thank you anyway :-)

i know, sorry.  Not enough time ATM to analyze in detail; i had just a
quick look and wanted to express my support :-)

> BUT: so far we're still discussing the interface and nothing of the
> implementation yet.
> And it will be hard as I'm still standing puzzled before each single Scheme
> snippet. By now I'm starting (slowly) to get into getting familiar with how
> this everything-is-an-expression-in-parens works. But I'm still feeling dumb
> when it comes to simple things like processing the elements of a list. Not
> to speak of all the interfaces between Scheme and LilyPond.

Don't feel dumb - i don't know how to get along with scheme either ;) (yet)

JAnek