[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710) |
Date: |
Sun, 22 May 2016 08:53:37 +0100 |
On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 17:51 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> HI Richard,
>
> On 22/05/2016, 5:41 PM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >I gave a link to a scan of the original print,
>
> You can’t view it unless you are a subscriber to IMSLP.
I heard they had introduced some sort of penalty system on IMSLP which
is a great pity. As I understand it though, they will still allow you to
download for free, but I suppose before you didn't have to register an
account (for free).
Richard
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
- Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/21
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Andrew Bernard, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Andrew Bernard, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Simon Albrecht, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Richard Shann, 2016/05/22
- Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710), Simon Albrecht, 2016/05/23
- Re: Switching the direction of slurs in tupletBracketToSlur (from Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)), Richard Shann, 2016/05/23