Re: Typesetting "as near to Petrucci style as possible".

[Simon Albrecht]

On 07.10.2016 20:34, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 12:13 -0400, Shane Brandes wrote:
> > Did you mean a 16th century font?
> yes, the time signature font is one of the things that is looks rather
> heavy against the LilyPond Petrucci glyphs. There are the early time
> indicator glyphs of course, but the Rebel print isn't using them.

Which is no surprise since you said it’s from 1712. 1712 notation is 
certainly closer to standard (i.e. mainly 19th century) notation than to 
Petrucci mensural notation.

Best, Simon