Re: Re-direct write processes in Frescobaldi?

[Ben]

On 2/17/2018 8:43 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote:

Hi Ben,

But then he is just writing a named file to the SSD, with the same (non) issues, so this is not any different,

Using Frescobaldi is not a danger to SSD's or other life forms (as far as we know...).

Andrew

Well no, if he saves the default directory preferences in Frescobaldi to a non-SSD drive (i.e. a secondary drive) it's fine is what I meant.
I attached screenshots showing the setting but I guess if he only has one drive in the system, then sure. Why not :) I guess so!

Either way, it's certainly a non-issue as far as SSD lifespan goes imo. I agree.

On 18 February 2018 at 08:49, Ben <address@hidden> wrote:

Again, Frescobaldi does not save temporary files at all, unless the file you're inputting and compiling has not been saved once.

So, as long as you open Frescobaldi and save the new document with a filename, there won't be any 'temp files' to worry about.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user