Re: [lwip-devel] netconn/socket: converting len argument to size_t

[Piero 74]

Simon...

do you think i can update to cvs head lwip? can i suppose is better
than v130 (many bugs are fixed) and also stable?

if i can, i want to try to offer my few cents on future lwip 140, with
socket2 and zero-copy, working with "senior" developers. please kept
in touch :o)

bye
piero

2009/2/12, address@hidden <address@hidden>:
> Piero 74 wrote:
>> i saw a lot of email from you, for closing bugs...
>>
>> are we close to release 131?
>>
>
> Hehe, that doesn't mean there's a realease coming, only I found the time
> and felt like working a little on the increasing list of bugs/patches.
>
>> in my current project, i have lwip 130 (not cvs head), only with the
>> patch we solved toghether... but i should update my code when a new
>> stable version will be available...
>>
>
> I don't know if we have that many changes from 1.3.0 to release a new
> version yet?
>
>> anyway... we should start to discuss and write something about
>> socket2, work on pbufs for dma driver-zero copy, lineguides for how
>> imlement dma driver-zero copy for rx and tx (there are a lot of emails
>> in recent mailinglist...)
>> what do you think?
>>
>
> After nearly a year of little time for lwIP, I'd like to decrease the
> list of bugs, patches and current tasks first before working on
> sockets2. Even zero-copy is rather an 1.4.0 issue than 1.3.1, I guess.
> But the current work on tcp_enqueue etc. is a good start for zero-copy.
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-devel
>