[Mldonkey-users] Re: Stop Uploading to mldonkeys without md4_signature

[Sven Hartge]

Parsloe Matchingham <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 18:31, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Michael Panteleit <address@hidden> wrote:

>> If we want to phase out the old mldonkeys, we have to give those users a
>> reason. Not getting anything out of the network would be one.
>> 
>> So, if we just isolate those old clients by
>> 
>> a) not uploading anything to hem
>> b) not sharing any sources with them
>> c) not sharing any servers with them
>> 
>> we can reach this goal.

> <sarcasm on>
> This will harm very badly since mldonkey is a very strong group inside
> the donkey of an overwhelming 7% maximum. (Never trust statistics you
> faked yourself)
> </sarcasm off>

You very efficently murdered my quote, since I also said:

,----
| Of course, the other clients out there should behave in the same way.
| eMules already ban mldonkey 1.x because of the abusive
| request-every-file behavoir of these old versions.
`----

> What you might achieve is, users switching to emule. Like me. Since 2.0
> (and I just give my 2 penny worth here only as numb user. So please no
> flames how stupid I am, I know this myself).

Well, mldonkey started as a Unix-client and the main userbase will be
unix users. So eMule is for the Winodws-World, mldonkey for the rest.

So why don't you just use the client you see fit best?

If you don't like mldonkey, its developement and download rate, why use
it?

S°

-- 
Letzte Worte eines Fahrlehrers: Nun versuchen Sie's  alleine