[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 bran
From: |
Richard Levitte |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:16:54 +0100 (CET) |
In message <address@hidden> on Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:26:55 +0100, Ludovic Brenta
<address@hidden> said:
ludovic> I reviewed your changes but not yet built from source. Here are my
ludovic> remarks:
ludovic>
ludovic> * monotone.pdf should not be gzipped. Please use dh_compress
--exclude=*.pdf
Check.
ludovic> * The package monotone should not depend on perl or python
ludovic> just because some contributed scripts do; use Recommends:
ludovic> instead.
Actually, experiments showed that those dependencies aren't needed at
all.
Both changes made in the same revision: c09c9bb055a27548b83c151f746bdb4787b62b42
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!"
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
- [Monotone-debian] Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Richard Levitte, 2011/02/21
- [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Richard Levitte, 2011/02/22
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Richard Levitte, 2011/02/22
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Francis Russell, 2011/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Francis Russell, 2011/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Richard Levitte, 2011/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Richard Levitte, 2011/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-debian] Re: Please have a look at the odm.for-mtn-1.0 branch, Richard Levitte, 2011/02/26