Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship

[Thomas Keller]

Bruce Stephens schrieb:
> Thomas Keller <address@hidden> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Oh, I'm sure we're all quite happy to accept your patches, detailed
> > bug reports and are of course willing to look over any feature
> > branches you may have been prepared!
>
> AFAIK there's no reason to believe that the people complaining have
> any interest in developing version control systems.  Rather, they're
> indicating that monotone seems like it's getting in the way more than
> git would.

Ok I got it. Sorry for the noise from my side and sorry for my reaction. 
I just had the perception that we do not aim to copycat git - if I 
wanted to know what monotone can and cannot do in comparison to git, I 
guess a look into their manual would have taught me as well. Maybe I 
have this syndrome called "fed up with feature requests which nobody 
implements anyways" (look at the "Ideas" wiki pages...), but then again, 
I probably do a lot people wrong who actually care about implementing 
one or the other thing on these lists.

And yes, maybe OE is indeed better off with git.

Thomas.

--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature