Re: [Monotone-users] Getting the sourece code for the latest monotone?

[Thomas Keller]

Am 08.10.2010 12:10, schrieb Thomas Moschny:
> Am Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:59:18 +0200
> schrieb Thomas Keller <address@hidden>:
> 
>>> 'mtn pull' worked fine after adding
>>>
>>>     mtn        4691/tcp                # Monotone Network Protocol
>>>     mtn        4691/udp                # Monotone Network Protocol
>>>
>>> to /etc/services. The lines for monotone were already there:
>>>
>>>     monotone        4691/tcp                # Monotone Network
>>> Protocol monotone        4691/udp                # Monotone Network
>>> Protocol
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you think this is bug of /etc/services?
>>>
>>> I don't think so. /etc/services is distributed so widely, I think
>>> mtn command should lookup "monotone" service if "mtn" cannot be
>>> found.  
>>
>> Hrm... this is an interesting problem I never came across myself.
>> Thomas Moschny is also Fedora user - Thomas, did you stumble across
>> this one before?
> 
> No, and I didn't even know that monotone calls getservbyname(3). So
> indeed we should (a) get that changed via IANA somehow and (b) try to
> ask for the 'mtn' service first, and if that fails also for 'monotone'.

I think netxx calls this internally and fails in 0.48, because we failed
to give it only a host name to connect to. In 0.99 this is not an issue
anymore because we don't use getservbyname(3) at all.

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature