[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:58:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
Op 13-12-18 om 22:17 schreef David Ramsey:
> Benno Schulenberg:
>> The pico provided by my distro (Ubuntu) accepts -q.
>
> I've checked, and so does mine. Ignoring it for compatibility may be an
> option, then: it would just require dropping comments about its being an
> obsolete option and updating the documentation to mention that it's
> ignored for Pico compatibility.
Done:
git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/nano.git/commit/?id=3121ee4b
Benno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/12/04
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/19
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/19