[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults
From: |
David Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Dec 2018 15:17:53 -0600 |
Benno Schulenberg:
> The pico provided by my distro (Ubuntu) accepts -q.
I've checked, and so does mine. Ignoring it for compatibility may be an
option, then: it would just require dropping comments about its being an
obsolete option and updating the documentation to mention that it's
ignored for Pico compatibility.
> When running 'pico -d', both <Delete> and <Backspace> delete a
> character rightward. When running 'nano -d', those keys still work in
> the normal way: <Backspace> deletes leftward, and <Delete> rightward.
> Except when one uses also -K, then nano behaves like Pico.
I'm getting different results depending on the terminal (using -d, not
using -K):
Linux console, xterm, KDE5's konsole, urxvt: Backspace deletes
leftward, Delete deletes rightward
rxvt, xfce4-terminal, LXQt's qterminal: Backspace deletes rightward,
Delete deletes rightward
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/12/04
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults,
David Ramsey <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] [RFC] is it time to break free from the Pico defaults, David Ramsey, 2018/12/19