[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Speed of Octave vs Matlab?
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: Speed of Octave vs Matlab? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:56:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:10:41AM -0700, rocketsound wrote:
> The profiler results above are taken from another script because I had it at
> my fingertips. I'll try to find out the source of the long execution time I
> was talking above (might be because of the huge amount of constraints I was
> using) but the result is the same: it's qp that slows down the code. Looking
> at __qp__ it seems like it is implementing a quite simple solving algorithm
> so my prediction is it simply scales bad with problem dimension. Sadly, no
> more information is given about what kind of algorithm lies behind the code.
An example for the very long execution time of __qp__ would indeed be
good. I'll probably check if an alternative to __qp__ can be applied
to quadprog in optim.
> Anyway, and beyond this thread, thanks for the interessent and your work you
> put into the GSCO this year, the code is pretty valuable to me.
Thanks a lot, but I mostly pass this on to Asma Afzal, who did most of
the work.
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Markus Bergholz, 2015/09/07
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Sebastian Schöps, 2015/09/08
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Alexander Barth, 2015/09/08