|
From: | Michael Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab? |
Date: | Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:26:29 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
This seems to be true. But, it
should be added that the implementation is very incomplete, and does not work on recent versions of llvm. It is likely that it could be made to work better. Or, does anyone have a better idea for a JIT? On 09/08/2015 10:15 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez
Hermoso wrote:
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |