[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake
From: |
Paul Schneider |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:56:47 -0800 |
You know, speaking of compiler ABI incompatibility, it occurs to me
that we provide a C API to the Rgba input / output classes for just
this reason. Couldn't a Shake developer compile exrlib with gcc 3, and
then compile a Shake plug-in with gcc 2.95 that links to exrlib and
just calls the C front end? It might be more complicated than this,
but it should be possible. Check out IlmImf/ImfCRgbaFile.h.
- Paul
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 10:14 PM, Matt Plec wrote:
Didn't Apple announce that Shake wouldn't be developed any further on
non-Apple OS's when they bought Nothing Real? Or have they taken
that back?
If I remember correctly, the announcement was that there wouldn't be
further windows releases, but that linux and irix would be supported
through 2003 and they'd reevaluate the market at that point.
Piotr -
I don't have any ideas about the compiler problems, but I have some
experience with Shake plugin development; if I can be of any
assistance please feel free to contact me.
Matt.
- [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Piotr Stanczyk, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Drew Hess, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Paul Schneider, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Kevin Wheatley, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Paul Schneider, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Matt Plec, 2003/03/06
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake,
Paul Schneider <=
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Drew Hess, 2003/03/07
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Kevin Wheatley, 2003/03/07
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Piotr Stanczyk, 2003/03/21
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Piotr Stanczyk, 2003/03/21
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Alec Bartsch, 2003/03/21