[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake
From: |
Piotr Stanczyk |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:44:42 +0000 |
Just to close on this thread, 1.0.5 is working very well in shake - the thing
seems much snappier too.
Piotr
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:37:36 +0000
Piotr Stanczyk <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all, thanks for all the suggestions.
> It seems that with some gentle persuation the shake IO file node seems to be
> working just fine. Hopefully this format can be adopted across the whole
> pipeline.
> (The flexible header data means that we can carry info into shake from the
> renderers and do some funky stuff)
> This is all still with version 1.0.4 and the local changes that were needed
> to build with gcc 2.95. As soon as I get a chance I will try this with the
> new 1.0.5.
>
> Once again, many thanks for all the help.
>
> Piotr
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 12:32:30 +0000
> Kevin Wheatley <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Drew Hess wrote:
> > > If Shake uses any C++ code internally, then no. The C API is just a
> > > wrapper around some C++ code. I don't know whether Shake does that or
> > > not, but I think Piotr said he was using a .cpp file from Shake as the
> > > basis for his plugin.
> > >
> > > If Shake doesn't use any C++ code, then yeah, you should be able to build
> > > OpenEXR using gcc 3.2 or 2.96 and link the plugin for use with Shake.
> >
> > Shake is all C++ with some token C bits. Nodes in your plugin derive
> > from one of many classes depending on the type of node you want. Which
> > means its certainly not worth my time to work out how to get anything
> > to work like this, even though from a performace standpoint you can
> > get hugh speed ups moving to the newer compiler version.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > --
> > | Kevin Wheatley | These are the opinions of |
> > | Senior Do-er of Technical Things | nobody and are not shared |
> > | Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | by my employers |
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openexr-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel
- [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Piotr Stanczyk, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Drew Hess, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Paul Schneider, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Kevin Wheatley, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Paul Schneider, 2003/03/05
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Matt Plec, 2003/03/06
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Paul Schneider, 2003/03/06
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Drew Hess, 2003/03/07
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Kevin Wheatley, 2003/03/07
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Piotr Stanczyk, 2003/03/21
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake,
Piotr Stanczyk <=
- Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake, Alec Bartsch, 2003/03/21