Re: [Openexr-devel] openExr & Shake

[Piotr Stanczyk]

Hi all, thanks for all the suggestions. 
It seems that with some gentle persuation the shake IO file node seems to be 
working just fine. Hopefully this format can be adopted across the whole 
pipeline.
(The flexible header data means that we can carry info into shake from the 
renderers and do some funky stuff)
This is all still with version 1.0.4 and the local changes that were needed to 
build with gcc 2.95. As soon as I get a chance I will try this with the new 
1.0.5.

Once again, many thanks for all the help.

Piotr




On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 12:32:30 +0000
Kevin Wheatley <address@hidden> wrote:

> Drew Hess wrote:
> > If Shake uses any C++ code internally, then no.  The C API is just a
> > wrapper around some C++ code.  I don't know whether Shake does that or
> > not, but I think Piotr said he was using a .cpp file from Shake as the
> > basis for his plugin.
> > 
> > If Shake doesn't use any C++ code, then yeah, you should be able to build
> > OpenEXR using gcc 3.2 or 2.96 and link the plugin for use with Shake.
> 
> Shake is all C++ with some token C bits. Nodes in your plugin derive
> from one of many classes depending on the type of node you want. Which
> means its certainly not worth my time to work out how to get anything
> to work like this, even though from a performace standpoint you can
> get hugh speed ups moving to the newer compiler version.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> -- 
> | Kevin Wheatley                   | These are the opinions of |
> | Senior Do-er of Technical Things | nobody and are not shared |
> | Cinesite (Europe) Ltd            | by my employers           |
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openexr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-devel