Re: [Protux-devel] status of automake

[tapio laxström]

Luciano Giordana wrote:
> The reason of this "hard" use of mustuxlib is that we actually have just one
> mustux application so far : protux. 

How about mustache?

> So maybe this is time to make it a real separated library. So feel free to make
> apropriate changes.
>
> Maybe the correct #include clausule would be
>
> #include <mustuxlib.h>

(Since this is going to effect every file on project, let's think this 
over...)
Or would the cvs-module name be: mustuxlib (like it is now)
Name of the library: libmustux (libtool style)
And the include file: mustux.h

Then include clausule would be '#include <mustux.h>' and LDFLAGS add-on 
'-lmustux'.

Current MustuxLib.hh is just including other files and that is not very 
handy for the public library interface file; maybe we shoud create new 
mustux.h with necessary externs.

I could next start to change the mustuxlib to use automake. After we can 
type 'make install' in mustuxlib we can easily start to use automake in 
protux.

btw. Have you allready desided where the content of the resources 
directory will be installed in "final" protux distribution?

--
best regards
--
tapio laxström