Re: [Qemu-devel] State of sparc64-softmmu

[Anthony Liguori]

Paul Brook wrote:
> > But this leads me to wonder, is this just an oversite or is there
> > something wrong with sparc64-softmmu that we don't recommend building it
> > by default?
> >     
>
> My understanding it that there are still several large chunks remaining to be 
> implemented, and it can not boot any real guest operating systems.
>   

If it's not building by default, it's going to bitrot (it already has).

So I'd suggest either making it build by default or removing it from the 
tree and moving it into a separate tree.

--
Regards,

Anthony Liguori