[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] State of sparc64-softmmu
|
From: |
Paul Brook |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] State of sparc64-softmmu |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:22:44 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29-2-amd64; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday 22 June 2009, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
> >> But this leads me to wonder, is this just an oversite or is there
> >> something wrong with sparc64-softmmu that we don't recommend building it
> >> by default?
> >
> > My understanding it that there are still several large chunks remaining
> > to be implemented, and it can not boot any real guest operating systems.
>
> If it's not building by default, it's going to bitrot (it already has).
Yes, although without any runtime tests it's still likely to suffer quite
badly from bitrot.
Paul