[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug
From: |
twb |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug |
Date: |
Thu Dec 18 00:18:02 2003 |
Quoth Cameron Patrick <address@hidden> on or about Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:19:28
+0800:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:33:46PM +1100, twb wrote:
> [re. lsheads]
> | Better as separate program.
>
> I'm not sure that it is. If it was built into ratpoison, it could show
> what the currently selected head is, and make a work-around for
> fdump/frestore only applying to one head possible.
But it would only work with ratpoison. This is why I want separate
keybinders, separate menus, separate minibuffers.
The counterargument is, of course, the overhead of forking et al.
--Trent of the Pick-n-mix Unix.
PS: This is my absolute last reply for this thread.
- [RP] xinerama patch bug, twb, 2003/12/16
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug, Cameron Patrick, 2003/12/16
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug, twb, 2003/12/16
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug, Cameron Patrick, 2003/12/17
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug, twb, 2003/12/17
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug, Cameron Patrick, 2003/12/18
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug,
twb <=
- Re: [RP] xinerama patch bug, sabetts, 2003/12/19
- [RP] Not the same thread., twb, 2003/12/19
- Re: [RP] Not the same thread., Joshua Neuheisel, 2003/12/19
- Re: [RP] Really the same thread., Cameron Patrick, 2003/12/20
- Re: [RP] Really the same thread., twb, 2003/12/20