[Savannah-hackers] Re: sf versus savannah

[Loic Dachary]

Marcel Hild writes:
 > 
 > I mean the export of savannah data to phpGW makes sense, but i dont know
 > wheather its worth to define a whole export format, if we can just write 
 > a conversion script which reads from svannah DB (maybe using savannah code)
 > and writes into phpGW.

        The thing is that we are not the only one to write the export format.
If we were alone that would be overkill, that's for sure.

 > I cant say how many people/companies out there really use SF (and maybe in
 > cooperation with phpGW). If its not so many, I would do it the straight 
 > forward
 > way:
 > 
 > 
 > >    When this is done a problems are fixed (two/three
 > > weeks). Start the migration of one application (task list for instance
 > > ?). And do each application one after the other until there are none left.
 > > 
 > 
 > This would result in to tasks being done at the same time:
 >  1) A conversion tool, that reads from savannah and writes into 
 >     phpGW
 >  2) Porting the savannah features to phpGW, which are not _so_ many, from my
 >     first look at phpGW (e.g. they have projects, they have a trouble ticket
 >     system).
 > 
 > What do you think?

        This is correct. 

-- 
Loic   Dachary         http://www.dachary.org/  address@hidden
24 av Secretan         http://www.senga.org/      address@hidden
75019    Paris         Tel: 33 1 42 45 09 16        address@hidden
        GPG Public Key: http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt