[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Vesta for savannah?
From: |
nferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Vesta for savannah? |
Date: |
08 May 2002 13:53:42 +0100 |
Loic Dachary <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Vesta has somewhat of a high learning curve, but maybe will work for us.
> > What do you all think?
>
> As always it is a matter of finding someone willing to deal
> with long term maintenance + support.
>
> For instance, CVS + viewcvs are the most maintenance + support
> consuming resources offered on Savannah. In average I'd say that Jaime
> Villate and myself spend 3 hours a week (each of us) dealing with
> it. Of course there are weeks where nothing needs to be done. But
> there also are weeks when I spend a full working day on it. For
> instance, in the past two weeks I integrated a patch provided by
> Laurent Julliard, spent some time testing it and monitored the
> activity to ensure no ill side effect occurs. I also had to move the
> CVS repository on a different partition to save I/O bandwidth and cope
> with a partition filling up. I also had to develop smarter scripts to
> deal with cvs backups so that cvs trees are not walked entirely for
> the sole purpose of figuring out if a file was updated. As a result
> the load average (http://subversions.gnu.org/mrtg/loadavg.html) is now
> back to normal. And, of course, learning CVS in order to maintain it
> for savannah.gnu.org required quite a lot of time. I'm sure you see
> what I mean ;-)
The other side of this is that there are a number of us who help
maintain CVS in smaller ways, advising users, performing small admin
tasks, etc...
If there was a different system that wouldn't happen for some time
(maybe even a few years) and the burden on the appointed
administrators would be increased.
Nic Ferrier