RE: [Simulavr-devel] version bump

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of Knut Schwichtenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:36 PM
> To: Joerg Wunsch
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] version bump
> 
> Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> >> I think it should be bumped.
> >> I think there should be a feature list for 1.0.
> It's really important to define that including a kind of road map
> >> I think there needs to be a project list for GSOC.
> > 
> > So what's the general opinion?
> > 
> > Currently, the version number displays as a rather mystic
> > "0.8.007-WR_b".
> > 
> > Given all the recent changes, I'd like to see it bumped 
> right now, say
> > to 0.95 or even 0.99.  
> I like the idea to bump the version, but 0.99 is to close 1.0 
> and without
> knowing what 1.0 will cover on my opinion. Let's bump it to 
> anything between
> 0.90 and 0.95. Let us define a feature list for 1.0 and next 
> let's use the space
> in between for the necessary steps to achieve 1.0.

I propose "0.9cvs"


> > Probably time to install Opensolaris on my old UltraSPARC 
> machine, and
> > try it there as well, just for a change. :-)
> No tuning of the AVR's without Atmels permission :-).

He works for Atmel. ;-)