RE: [Simulavr-devel] Use of Python in simulavrxx

[Michael Hennebry]

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Weddington, Eric wrote:

> I'm pretty agnostic to the language issue. If more people prefer python over 
> Tcl, then by all means we should keep the python support, and plan on migrating 
> away from Tcl to python.
>
> The key is that we need help in maintaining this area. I would prefer that in 
> this early stage we pick a single IF and stick with it. I don't want to support 
> everything under the sun that swig supports. Python seems to be more in favor 
> these days and I certainly have nothing against it.
>
> Michael, Knut, can you help out in this area?

If desired, I'd be willing to try to support the python bindings.
Note:
I'm not very good with the simulator yet.
I've not done any interlanguage linking with python before.
So far, my greatest feats of interlanguage linking are
BAL/FORTRAN, C++/FORTRAN, and AVR-assembly/C.
That said, I rather like python and would
likely get around to python/C++ eventually.

Pardon me while I google swig.org.

--
Michael   address@hidden
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."