[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Event-Oriented Computing
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Event-Oriented Computing |
Date: |
07 Feb 1999 13:37:31 -0800 |
>>>>> "GR" == glen e p ropella <address@hidden> writes:
GR> You put ALife into the Swarm kernel that hunts down and destroys agents
GR> that use system calls and I'll put ALife in there that tries to
GR> use system calls but obfuscates the fact that it uses system
GR> calls.
I expect that much reckless experimentation will end in failure, and
so it might be useful to install in the simulator some pattern
detection for common failure syndromes, e.g. CPU-sucking NOP loops,
suspicious use of system calls, or more conceptual level detection
like for tragedy of the commons. A library of response strategies
(either automatic or triggered by experimenter confirmation) for
bringing order to the experiment might be helpful for debugging models --
being able to backtrack and not having to start over with a new set
of parameters. An immune system for Swarm.
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing, (continued)
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing, glen e. p. ropella, 1999/02/05
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/02/06
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing, glen e. p. ropella, 1999/02/07
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing, Nelson Minar, 1999/02/07
- Smart Agents (was Re: Event-Oriented Computing, Paul E. Johnson, 1999/02/07
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing (formerly), Jan Burse, 1999/02/07
- Re: Event-Oriented Computing,
Marcus G. Daniels <=