[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User Estimates
From: |
Holly Arrow |
Subject: |
Re: User Estimates |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) |
Averaging these numbers seems odd -- why average the number of
unique posters PER WEEK (?) with the number of people on swarm-support?
I think you need to define what you mean as the user community (who
counts as a "user"?), and partition it into different levels of membership
status represented by swarm-support, downloading 1.0, and
going to SwarmFest.
Thinking of core and periphery makes more sense, with fuzzy boundaries
between core & periphery and between periphery and non-community.
The 258 people who downloaded 1.0 should all be counted as part of
the community in some sense, as should everyone subscribing to
swarm-support, even if they don't have the program up and
running yet (like me). If you can cross reference those two lists and
delete duplicates, I'd say that's a good fuzzy estimate of the
total moderately-involved community (maybe around 300?). You could go out
one more level and include non-redundant members of swarm-announce for a
larger number (closer to 400 maybe?).
You probably want an estimate of people who are ACTIVELY using swarm right
now. Anyone who has posted a bug or help message probably qualifies -- but
you need to look at the archive, not just take a week's sample of posts to
swarm-support. Six months would be a more reasonable sample, since
working on swarm projects probably waxes and wanes for many active users
depending on their other commitments.
Hits on the web page are probably not a very useful indicator of community
membership. Downloading & joining swarm support are both good indicators
of peripheral membership (at least) because they show active involvment
rather than just browsing a web page; posting bug and help questions is an
indicator of fuller involvement, since you need to be actively
installing or running to encounter technical problems; going to SwarmFest
represents core membership.
I agree with using some multiplier of SwarmFest attendance to count people
who are equally involved but couldn't afford the time/money or had a
scheduling conflict.
Thinking of how many conferences I actually attend versus how many I
would attend if time/money/scheduling was no conflict, my rough guess is
to multiply by three, for a total of around 130 core members, with a
periphery of another 200 or so and maybe another 100 hanging out in the
fringes on swarm-announce.
That's my 2 cents as a social psychologist and self-declared peripheral
member hoping to move toward the core when I have time this summer ...
Holly A.
> Hey guys,
>
> Here's my small effort at estimating our user community.
> Please correct my math and let me know if anybody has
> any clever ideas about how to get a good estimate.
>
>
> 17 posts to swarm-support from unique posters/week
> => minimum of 17 active users
>
> 44 attendees at SwarmFest
> 92 release.html web page hits last week
> 160 members of swarm-support
> 258 downloads of swarm-1.0.? by unique users since release of 1.0
>
> => upper bound of ~114 active users
> (statistic average (17+44+92+160+258)/5 = 114.2)
>
>
> glen
> p.s. There are 377 members of swarm-announce.
>
> --
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> |glen e. p. ropella (address@hidden) | |
> |Hive Drone, SFI Swarm Project | Hail Eris! |
> |http://www.trail.com/~gepr/home.html | |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
*****************************************************************************
Holly Arrow, Assistant Professor address@hidden
Department of Psychology & Center for Social Cognition & Decision Making
1227 University of Oregon at the
Eugene OR 97403 Institute for Cognitive and Decision Sciences
Phone: (541) 346-1996 University of Oregon
FAX: (541) 346-4911 FAX: (541) 346-4914
******************************************************************************