[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts
From: |
Chris Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:23:48 +0000 |
On Monday 25 March 2002 22:46, Open Source wrote:
> I can see a couple of uses for these kind of agents
>
V. Good examples, but I don't think the LDS/VRS is
designed to support them:
> a) They can be used to determine whether the LDS is
> still alive. This allows the cluster administrator to
> have a GUI screen that provides information to the end
> user providing information on the nodes creating the
> VRS.
True.
But if we're using a distributed middleware to support
the VRS, then that middleware does all this for you - it's
central to it's operation - certainly with Goldwater.
> b) Provide performance statistics
Again the middleware should do this, as it's the
middleware that controls the routing of messages between
LDS's, and its a function of the application not a
product of it.
Besides, the agents aren't supposed to be able to
access the physical machine.
C
--
Chris Smith
Technical Architect - netFluid Technology Limited.
"Internet Technologies, Distributed Systems and Tuxedo Consultancy"
E: address@hidden W: http://www.nfluid.co.uk
- [Vrs-development] thoughts, Tim Terlegård, 2002/03/23
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Open Source, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Tim Terlegård, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Tim Terlegård, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/27