[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts
From: |
Tim Terlegård |
Subject: |
Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:46:38 +0100 |
> If we the use the above approach, the mobile agent
> will not be accessing the physical machine but the
> sanbox within which the VRS is running.
> The usage of the mobile agent can be further extended
> to handle aysnc control messages used within the
> cluster.
>
> Does this make sense?
To me it makes very much sense!
-- Tim
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, (continued)
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Bill Lance, 2002/03/23
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Open Source, 2002/03/25
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Tim Terlegård, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Open Source, 2002/03/26
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts,
Tim Terlegård <=
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Tim Terlegård, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/27
- Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/27
Re: [Vrs-development] thoughts, Chris Smith, 2002/03/26