wesnoth-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Translatinos in 1.0


From: Yann Dirson
Subject: Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Translatinos in 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:10:40 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:44:07PM +0200, Nils Kneuper wrote:
> I think we should take out TDH soon, so that translators do not work
> on it anymore when it will not be in 1.0.

If we're going to drop TDH from official release, it makes sense.  We
could move it to the download server, for example.

But maybe we could provide more support for 3rd-party campaigns, like
a CVS module.  That may help to coordinate work on these, to get them
in shape for official endorsement.


> I think we do have to setup a list of rules, to estimate, when a
> translation is in 1.0 and when not.

Why should we ?  We could instead use such criteria for advertising
translations, and/or maybe to tag them as "complete" i=or "incomplete"
in the selection dialog, but I do not think we should stop shipping
the other ones.  It would IMHO harm the project, by letting
translators think we do not value their work.

OTOH, having such a thing like an "official translation" label may
encourage teams to reach this goal, much like isaac's stat page create
a friendly competition to get to 100% - which is maybe a distant goal
nowadays because of the amount of work to get there, so I would
welcome a more reasonable goal.


> - The mainfile should be rather complete (~99%)
> - wesnoth-lib should be complete (100%)
> - wesnoth-httt should be rather complete (>95%)

Eg, we could have a new view in the stats page about those "core
translations", and this should maybe become the default view, instead
of "all official domains".

Best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson    <address@hidden> |
Debian-related: <address@hidden> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]