[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2016 20:51:34 -0500 |
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 19:24:11 -0500 Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
wrote:
> > It's a debugger that does the same job as GDB, but it's based
> > on the Clang and LLVM toolkit for looking at the world, not
> > binutils, GCC, etc. Compared to GDB, LLDB has a different and
> > (IMHO) uglier command syntax, but both LLDB and GDB support the
> > MI protocol.
>
> Why would we want to support it
> rather than saying, "We support GDB -- use that."?
Because there are platforms that do not ship with gdb.
macOS for example ships with lldb these days. lldb is also the
debugger of choice for a bunch of languages like Swift that have no
gdb support. (The reference Swift implementation is free
software.) I'm not sure if Rust only is supported by lldb but I think
that may be the case, I would have to check.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14
- Re: lldb support, Joseph Mingrone, 2016/11/15
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/16
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support,
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10