[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:54:32 -0500 |
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:26:18 -0500 Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
wrote:
> > > Why would we want to support it
> > > rather than saying, "We support GDB -- use that."?
>
> > All the usual reasons people prefer tool A over tool B:
> > compatibility with a specific environment, personal
> > customizations, familiarity, and personal preference. LLDB is
> > free software. We should support it.
>
> Your argument disregards the important fact that LLDB is part
> of a project that aims to replace many important GNU packages,
> and its success is the GNU Project's loss.
I thought the goal of the GNU Project was to further the cause of
free software and not to make some particular brand of free software
more popular. Was I mistaken?
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14
- Re: lldb support, Joseph Mingrone, 2016/11/15
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/16
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support,
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/12