[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Joseph Mingrone |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:13:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) |
John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
> If a volunteer is willing to give us code to support using lldb, does it then
> become a question of which uses to _not facilitate_? That's really what I
> reacting to. I totally understand not *making an effort* to support something
> that might inhibit the growth of gdb; but if we're in the position of
> receiving code to support lldb, then should the same argument be used to deny
> its acceptance. Or is this not what you're saying?
Such code to support LLDB exists.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/editors/emacs/files/extrapatch-lldb-gud.el?view=log
It's available now for Emacs users on at least one (free) operating system.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14
- Re: lldb support,
Joseph Mingrone <=
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/16
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10